Bluegriffon templates download10/12/2023 ![]() Also, certain (minor) aspects of the program haven't yet been converted into English. openElement has obviously been developed in French and, at present, English is the only other language. What the web still badly needs is a truly open, free and fully-developed web editor, but if you expect openElement to deliver this then you'll be very sadly disappointed.īTW, oompoop's comment about the limited language support has validity. Why the developers have taken such an authoritarian and limited approach to openElement is anyone's guess. It may, however suit the neophyte who wants to experiment with web pages for the first time. Moreover, ultimately, this type of web development environment isn't as flexible as is even BlueGriffon (in it's full form) or a product like Dreamweaver. This is something that I'd not contemplate.įor this reason, like BlueGriffon, I reckon openElement will never develop a really large following. If you download a template and install it then the website certainly knows that template has been installed on a machine at IP address xyz. Like BlueGriffon, there's a gotcha but of a very different kind. This is very disconcerting indeed - from a security and privacy point to an ongoing dependence on the website to fully utilize the software and its templates. exe files in an incomplete format/state, the exe then downloads the remainder of the template and installs it per se (essentially the template exe is just a downloader and installer). However, templates initially download as executable. Second: when openElement goes on-line one is confronted with templates at its website. If you do not then you essentially get an error message when it can't 'call home'. First: when you install it, it almost insists that you run it in on-line mode. As of this release, it has some very nasty tendencies which would definitely stop me using it: (BlueGriffon, of course, being only a pretend-free editor, in that it's substantially nobbled-you really have to buy BlueGriffon's add-ons to make it do anything useful.)Īt first glance, it is hard to tell whether openElement will become a practicably useable free product or not. OpenElement is an interesting program, it seems to be a very different take on that other Mozilla-core-using web editor, BlueGriffon, it much more resembles Microsoft's Expression Web than does BlueGriffon. Honestly, I've tried a bunch of these programs and this is the first one I'm not pulling my hair out over. I'm also trying my hand at creating elements using the element editor, but I have to brush up on my programming a bit, lol. I love that I can use my own scripts if I need to or tweak the css easily using the properties menu. The code is fine, especially since I haven't had any browser compatibility issues. Other things: The support on the forum is great. ![]() I tend to work from scratch anyway, but the templates can be a great starting off point. I figure, if you have to download the program in the first place, you can download a few templates if you need them. I don't have a problem with needing to be online to download templates, etc, nor with the way the templates themselves are downloaded. ![]() It's true that you can't simply import existing html pages, but if you have all the images and stuff, it's fairly easy to reproduce most layouts. I haven't really run into any problems with openelement. You can design a basic layout and then invoke it on as many pages as you want. ![]() I've saved a lot of time with this wysiwyg editor (and what do you know, it all shows up great in the browser!). I've been using it for a few months and love the features and workflow. I can understand some of the previous reviewers' concerns, but I love this program. A part of my job is testing and vetting software for users and commence and I see hundreds of them over a week or so, and I can assure you that developers who insist on such arrogant behavior never get past square one–no matter how good the software is. Also, why aren't the templates offered as a proper separate download (in say the way IrfanView does by bulk-loading its plugins in one file–this would solve the online problem)?įrankly, I'm damn tired of demand-driven software that insists users do things in exactly the way the developer demands. If the developer can't include a default template and a few other samples in a 45MB file then one has to wonder what his actual motives are. The reasons for this ought to be obvious to Blind Freddy. Moreover, in my case (same with my colleagues) the installation of downloaded programs is never done with the net connected for safety reasons (and they can be days–sometimes weeks–apart). Version still doesn't work offline! Downloading and running are two separate operations, when running the program the user may not have an internet connection (as is often the case with me, usually very deliberately so for obvious reasons).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |